Social Contact: The “Why” and the “How”

Social contact is one of the most effective methods for reducing stigma toward people with lived or living experience of substance use (PWLE). In organisational settings, contact helps disrupt assumptions and stereotypes by replacing distance with understanding, and judgement with human connection.

What “social contact” means here

Social contact is structured contact - where PWLE share experiences of stigma, recovery, care, exclusion, hope, and what helps. It can be:

Direct

(in person, face to face)

Indirect

(video, online, written narratives, imagined interaction)

It is not the same as routine staff‑service user interaction in treatment contexts, because usual service delivery can involve power imbalances and role expectations.

What “ingredients” makes contact effective?

Effective contact includes:

The message

  • Emphasise that recovery and health improvement are possible

  • Show competence, strengths, and achievements (including early recovery)

  • Correct stereotypes carefully (avoid repeating myths in ways that reinforce them

The delivery

  • PWLE should be supported or trained to share experiences safely and confidently

  • Use person‑first, respectful language that focuses on the person, not labels

  • Consider multiple points/forms of contact (e.g. video and a facilitated discussion)

The interaction

Contact is most stigma‑reducing when:

  • People are treated as equal status participants

  • There are clearly defined shared goals (e.g. improving services, reducing harm)

  • There are opportunities for continued interaction afterwards

What it looks like in practice

A well‑designed session might include:

Facilitated reflection: “What surprised you? What assumptions were challenged?”

A discussion on practical changes staff can make

A commitment moment: one change to trial this week

A short-lived experience story (in person or video)

Safeguarding the experience

Social contact must not exploit or re‑traumatise PWLE. Build in:

Clear boundaries and support

Choice and control over what is shared

Fair recognition or compensation for people sharing their lived expertise

Quick reflection

Where could your organisation create structured, safe contact that treats lived experience as equal expertise - not as a “story” for others to consume?